“Anticipation of War” p:21/16

AyinBase / Ayin Beis with R' Paltiel, Tammuz 5775 

Page 21 of pamphlet – (At about lower third of the page. Line begins: 'noflim...'). Page 15 of the book. For text see below.

Please feel free to leave comments below or collaborate with us in Slack - for an invitation to Slack and questions: dailychassidus@gmail.com

Direct light represents its source. It is very focussed and has a direct address. There is nothing inadvertent about it.

When the light is reflective it is hap-hazard. The intent element is not seen. This is like noflim ottiot – letters fall from it. The intent is lost and you just have the hap-hazard affect.

The direct light does not anticipate any ojection. It does not create a means for presentation. It is not ready for war. When there are times of conflict then 'letters fall out' that present the light... the letters were not part of the initial presentation. In a soul to soul communication there are no letters. There is no need for presentation.

When there is opposition it is like a deconstruction of the argument. The initial simplicity and obviousness, falls apart.

There is a fall to a lower level where the argument begins to present itself. This is the level of ottiot/letters.

The higher level is like sight. Things are seen, and obvious – there is a direct relationship to the subject.

When there is a challenge and the simplicity and purity falls apart, then the letters, and structual elements fall out...

Happenstance/hap-hazard means that it was secondary, even though it is part of the initial thought.

The destination is primary, and the route you take to get there is secondary or happenstance.

The secondary element seems as if it could have come about by 'trial and error'.