Page 17 – seven lines from the top of the page. Line starts, “aval ke-asher”.
It is the softness in each koach, that permits the opposite, that is within it.
When it is in its own simplicity it is 100% itself – it doesn't explain or justify itself. You should question you existence, since it is not prisine/simple, but rather formulated. If I am water or fire the pristine form can be presented this way. A doctor thinks the whole world stands on medicine, a politician on politics, a mechanic on mechanism, psychologist on psychology, an economist on economics – why? Since each sees himself in pashitus/simplicity he sees the world operating this way. He goes to the depth of the the matter till it resonates with his soul. When in it's simplicity it exresses itself with great strength.
This simplicity is an opposite of the softness. Only when breaking down into its details/specifics is it able combine with its opposite. A table and chair are very different, but if you examine the components of a table, and a chair they both have a board and four legs. By looking at what each one consists of do you find the commonality. To correlate and see similarity, one needs to get into the details.
For video, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment