AyinBase / Ayin Beis with R' Paltiel Sunday 26
Tevet 5774
Page 48
At
1st line from the top of the page –
(line
begins: "ha-arah...”) For text, click: Here.
At the end of page 47
we saw how the Godly reflection can reach a level where it opposes
Godliness – opposes its own reality. This is not the result of
normal hishtalshalus (process of creation). Rather, there is a
deeper concealment that can result in the rise of the sitrah achrah
(the other side).
World is by
definition, 'tangibility'. Sight is beyond touch. This is a certain
element of the Godly reflection. The other side says, 'I am not even
interested in the light that the garments contain. I just want the
garment'.
The garment is not a
reflection. It contains a Godly reflection.
We see beyond the
garment. This is how mind/sechel sees...
The other side
intentionally denies that there is any spiritual content.
Sechel/mind is not a
tangible or physical entity. It is spiritual. It is beyond thought.
When something is explained, the words are only the garments. You
look for the light and truth that they present. You listen beyond
the words.
It is a soul faculty,
not a body faculty. If you want to 'wrap your brain around an idea',
you are thinking with the physical brain, rather than the soul.
We need to focus on
the sechel not the brain.
The secular world
defines the human being from a 'garment' perspective.
We are looking at how
all that is seen in the world is just a ha-arah / a reflection. And
as 'proof' we saw that this reflection can be so reduced that it can
become 'the other side'.
This enclothment that
conceals and hides the Godly light so thoroughly, so that the 'other
side' can gain existence, is possible only because it is just a
reflection/ha-arah.
Because it is just a
reflection, it can be grasped by the 'clothing' to the extend that
the 'element of good and bad' can result. This 'element of good and
bad' means that good exist in contrast to bad. In Godliness there is
no 'good and bad'.
Only a
ha-arah/reflection can be completely sunk into a worldly context, to
the extent that the Godly perspective is completely lost...
But all this
described above is not applicable to the inner light, or the essence.
This kind of light
cannot be dressed in garments.
No comments:
Post a Comment