Tuesday, August 16, 2011

“The Depth of Essence” p: 51


AyinBase with R' Paltiel p: 51 8/16/11 Tuesday 16 MenachemAv 5771  

Page 51 – below middle of the page (line starts: mah...)

We are pointing out that the light, even at the level of etzem, where it is not functional, yet still it is not comparable to the essence. It stands for the essence, yet it is nevertheless light – and thus a 'non-entity' compared to the essence.

We cannot really surmise the depth of essence. We can only relate to process and essence has no beginning – you can't even say, 'self-creating'. None of our faculties can grasp this.



While it is true that there is a close relationship between essence/luminary and light, nevertheless, (and when we look at the sun it gives light automatically, but paradoxically in the analog the Essence gives light, but it is volitional, without any extra activity) the light is not comparable to the essence.

The soul is an essence – a true essence – the life it give is volitional, and when it wants to give, it is without effort.

The light reflects the essence so qualitatively they may be similar, nevertheless the light is just a reflection, not the essence. The luminary is an aspect of yesh amiti / true being – completely different from anything that 'comes into being'. This is like truth being only a reflection of the essence. Light 'makes a statement of truth' and the essence is beyond statement.    

No comments:

Post a Comment