AyinBase / Ayin Beis with R' Paltiel, Nissan
5775
Page
12 of pamphlet –
(at
around the middle of page. Line begins: mochin...'). Page 9 of the
book.
For text see below.
Please feel free to
leave comments below or collaborate with us in Slack - for an
invitation to Slack and questions: dailychassidus@gmail.com
We
have discussed that indeed mochin/sechel is manifest in lower
faculties, where these limbs are not really suitable for that kind of
enclothment...
Mochin/mind,
even though present in a worldly environment, is essentially beyond
world and the worldly element is secondary.... Sight is a spiritual
experience, and the eye itself is not sensed – this is a metaphor
for mind...
Mochin/mind
relates directly to how things 'should be'. Emotions/midot are
reactive. Mochin asks, 'what is right? What is the truth?'
With
sight a whole panorama can be seen in an instant. It is above
observing each mile and detail separately. It is so real, yet it is
above process! The reason is that the principle of sight differs
from the principle of touch, where 'your experience' tells you about
the object. In sight the 'primary truth of the object and reality'
is dominant. This is like seeing from the Creator's vantage point,
where things don't take up any room...
If
we doubted that there is a world, then sight would not show it to us.
The first principle says Rambam, is to know that there is a First
Being who is the foundation for all...
Life
is not something we actively pursue. We breathe because He breathes
into us. If we had to work at breathing, it would be torture.
There is an essence of life in this world.
Chochmah
sees the truth from a reality perspective. And a purpose is
perceived – to bring the truth down into a physical reality of 6
dimensions...
How could one imagine that he is in a state where he doubts that there is a world? and if one was in that state (or imagined it), would his sight not show him the world? would he see the world and merely doubt it's reality? what exactly would one see in this state?
ReplyDeleteHi. Sorry for the delay. Here's a way to think of this, "He would know the world only by constant reassurance and proof. It would be a world without a sense reality. Imagine someone needing to get hurt to affirm that there's a tree in his path. "
DeleteHope that clarifies matters. Please don't hesitate to be in touch.
Thanks for you comment/question. We plan to get back to you on this today....
ReplyDeleteThank you for the insight.
ReplyDelete