AyinBase / Ayin Beis with R' Paltiel, Tammuz 5775
Page
21 of pamphlet –
(At
about lower third of the page. Line begins: 'noflim...'). Page 15
of the book.
For text see below.
Please feel free to
leave comments below or collaborate with us in Slack - for an
invitation to Slack and questions: dailychassidus@gmail.com
Direct
light represents its source. It is very focussed and has a direct
address. There is nothing inadvertent about it.
When
the light is reflective it is hap-hazard. The intent element is not
seen. This is like noflim ottiot – letters fall from it. The
intent is lost and you just have the hap-hazard affect.
The
direct light does not anticipate any ojection. It does not create a
means for presentation. It is not ready for war. When there are
times of conflict then 'letters fall out' that present the light...
the letters were not part of the initial presentation. In a soul to
soul communication there are no letters. There is no need for
presentation.
When
there is opposition it is like a deconstruction of the argument. The
initial simplicity and obviousness, falls apart.
There
is a fall to a lower level where the argument begins to present
itself. This is the level of ottiot/letters.
The
higher level is like sight. Things are seen, and obvious – there
is a direct relationship to the subject.
When
there is a challenge and the simplicity and purity falls apart, then
the letters, and structual elements fall out...
Happenstance/hap-hazard
means that it was secondary, even though it is part of the initial
thought.
The
destination is primary, and the route you take to get there is
secondary or happenstance.
The
secondary element seems as if it could have come about by 'trial and
error'.
No comments:
Post a Comment