AyinBase with R' Paltiel Friday 22 Elul 5772
Page
174 – lower end of the top paragraph
(line
starts, 'hazimzum...') For text, see picture below.
The
tzimzum per se is a total interruption – absence of light. Even
after the light comes again there is still an element of absence, in
that it is not invested in the recipients. After the parsa the light
is invested in the vessels of the lower level.
Sechel
is based on the soul's will and pleasure, not on observations. The
master's mind is so structured. It is derived from his soul and not
founded upon any specific structure. By contrast for the student it
is the structure and the logic that gives him a grasp. Then he has
to labour and work till he finds it in his own soul, till he can
become a rav/master himself. This is a long process.
So
this is the difference between atzilus and briah. Atzilus is like
the master. Through the parsa the light of the higher level is
invested in the lower level.
By
contrast the tzimzum is followed by a light that is not invested in
the level below it. There is light after a complete absence.
The
light of the line/kav is like the light of the luminary and has an
aspect of essence.
Essence
cannot be grasped in a vessel, yet this light has an aspect of
essence, to such an extent that it can create from 'nothing to
something'.
No comments:
Post a Comment