Thursday, August 9, 2012

“Review Session – I Give What I Am” p: 170



AyinBase with R' Paltiel ThursdayNight 21 MenachemAv 5772 

Page 170 - 2nd paragraph of the page (line starts, 've ha dugmah...') For text, see link top right of the blog. And picture below.

This morning we looked at how it is possible that the kav/line that comes after the tzimzum, there is an element of ein sof / infinity.

A mashal/metaphor for this would be sight. Even though it comes through a faculty and there is an interaction, yet we see the real thing – not just that which we can pick up. Hearing covers what we can discern, but sight is the thing itself. The Rebbe explains that this is due to the fact that the ohr ein sof / infinity initiates the revelation of the kav.

Since it initiates, thus its quality is part of the kav/line.

Kav/line is after the infinity. It goes through the contraction/tzimzum. 

The line starts from above. And thus what is intended to be given, is not just to satisfy a need, but rather to 'give what I am'. He wants to give everything, but he gives it via the kav/line.

To receive what the master gives, the student has to be devoid of his own interests and questions. He dedicates to what his mentor tells him and is not involved in his own attempt to understand what is being given.

The mentor overcomes the question and gives the background truth, where the question is not a question.

The metaphor of the host and the guest; if the guest says, 'thanks' and walks out with the food – that's klipah/unholiness – he's in the mode of 'what is in it for me?' - he's not interested in the relationship.  

19th minute of video, 3rd line of the second paragraph p170 – after the tzimzum the light returns – this represents kiruv. This means that the reason there is mentorship is because the infinite light is close, and the line stays connected with this infinity, where it is initiated.

Thus the kav/line has the element of infinity, although it is limited.

The mentorship is by means of measure and definition.

You receive a ray of light into your room, but it announces that there is an infinite sun above!

It is You that binds all the sphirot together. The light that represents You – the G-dly light unifies all the aspects. When you see interinclusion of opposites it is by means of the kav/line that is the opposite of limitation.  

Before the kav/line there is no separation of details. After the kav they are revealed with the ability to be unified...

What is the principle of inter inclusion of opposites?

Before the tzimzum/contraction there is no inter inclusion of opposites – there are no particulars.

So what is there?

To have some grasp of this we will look again at the metaphor of the table and the human being. The human being has ownership – he represents G-d in the world. He resembles other creatures in many ways and is vulnerable to the effects of the world, but there is a principle difference. All other creatures represent that they can provide for themselves in the world – that is the beginning and end of their being. The human being is completely different. He is involved in the word, only for the sake of bringing G-dliness into the world, and to bring it down to world he has to be involved in the atmosphere of world...

We do have pure knowledge directly from the soul, that is dressed in the brain, so it can be grasped in the world, and affect the world. But what is the human being essentially, he is that faith/emunah. And the reason he can ownsomething is because the world was created for his sake.

There is no cumulative ownership. Here's an illustration. Let's say Zvi decides to buy the neighboring house and then he breaks through the dividing wall. Does he have to expand himself to be master over this new area? No. ownership does not depend on cumulative actions – it is just the principle of ownership. This is to explain that before the tzimzum/contraction there are no particulars.

It consists of the truth. He has a G-dly presence and he is everywhere.

The light before the contraction is on the level of primary reality, and thus there are no particulars.  


No comments:

Post a Comment